advertisement

advertisement

Taser death spurs debate

The death of a man subdued by RCMP officers using a Taser gun at Vancouver International Airport early Sunday has renewed debate over the use the non-lethal weapon.

According to Amnesty International, which is asking for a moratorium on Tasers, the death is the 16th in Canada since the RCMP began carrying the non-lethal weapon made by the US company, Taser International, in mid 2000.

The hand-held guns, which are illegal for private ownership in Canada, are used by police departments to control resisting suspects by shooting up to 50,000 volts of low-wattage electricity through their bodies. The current can temporarily paralyze even the most belligerent of suspects.

Manitoba RCMP have been carrying Taser guns since 2002, according to Cpl. Chris Ballard, RCMP spokesman for “D” division. He says that Tasers are a useful tool in apprehending criminals.

“It’s used on people who have resistive and combative behaviour,” says Ballard. “Tasers are effective when people are suicidal, and with people who just want to fight.”

Ballard says that there have been no deaths due to Tasers in Manitoba within the RCMP, and says that officers are trained to use split-second judgment to decide what level of force to use in subduing a subject.

“Use of force is up to the officer to assess, dangers present to himself and others, including the offender are considered before deciding on what type of force should be used.”

One factor the RCMP trains its officers to recognize is a disorder called excited delirium, which according to Elizabeth Berton-Hunter of Amnesty International Canada is a major cause of Taser deaths in Canada.

“When a person is suffering from excited delirium they are often excited and exhausted, and that is a dangerous combination.”

Berton-Hunter says that most of the fatalities are caused when the symptoms of excited delirium are mixed with the electricity from the Taser resulting in heart failure.

Amnesty International wants to shelve Taser guns in Canada until more research is done on the safety of the weapons.

“We’ve asked for a full independent review, because the only reviews that have been done so far have been done by Taser International.”

Ballard, who has been shot by a Taser in training, says that although Amnesty International has good intentions, the moratorium is not necessary.

“It hurts, and it definitely incapacitated me, but once it was over I was back to normal. There has been quiet a bit of research done and all I can say is it’s a safer alternative than firearms to a threat.”

Comments

Jim Burns » Oct 15th 2007, 20:30

Avatar

They use a gun we get upset and they use a somewhat safer thing we still cry. Why don't we just let the criminals run the streets o yea they do they have more protection than me

Shawn Houde » Oct 15th 2007, 21:01

Avatar

This is a very illuminating piece. The energy of your writing is astounding. I hope I never get tasered!

Matt Pearce » Oct 16th 2007, 15:15

Avatar

Don't Taze me bro.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZ3GXLpClD4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kA8fD6YvyJk

Jim Burns » Oct 16th 2007, 20:32

Avatar

Just so you know I have been not fun but it beats a bullet, was done at manufacturer's demo . As I say what do you want when someone is threatening your life and being a asshole when asked to sit down or spitting at you . Maybe some of you people should spend a night on patrol with the police, to see what is like then the gun will probably look good. Armchair experts always know best when they are home safe in bed.

T M » Oct 17th 2007, 22:41

Avatar

Jim, who are you venting about? I don't see anyone giving you grief.

As with anything, common sense should prevail. The chance that a bullet will be lethal is far greater than a Taser. However, I am always a fan of unbiased research. Perhaps the voltage is too high or the situations they are being used are not warranted. Sixteen deaths from a supposed non-lethal alternative is probably something to be looked into.

And Jim, I imagine a lot of the people tasered are not the criminals that are running the streets. More likely intoxicated, mentally ill or young offenders. I would be interested in those stats.

Jim Burns » Oct 19th 2007, 20:14

Avatar

Iam just tired of people who think that we should not use force while criminals are treated like they are within there rights to commit crime. Cause god knows there has to be some excuse. People the time of being nice is not working look outside and relize that. Trust the people who you pay to enforce the rules or get a gun.

Leave a Comment

Interested in contributing to WinnipegFIRST? Registered users can not only leave comments on any posted article, but can even submit their own articles and news stories for publication! If you want to start participating, click here to Register.

author

Avatar

T. Shane Gibson

  • 30 years old
  • Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
  • User since Sep 18th 2007, 09:25

advertisement